Your show on AIDS was very interesting to me as a citizen activist who has worked for many years on issues of hunger and poverty. The terrifying increase in AIDS has made that disease one of the primary poverty issues in the world today. Based on my own experience with this issue I felt that your show left out some important points.
First, the Bush administration's AIDS initiative, while a welcome change in policy, is aimed at only 15 countries. In contrast, the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria has funded programs in 129 countries. The administration's bilateral AIDS programs omit completely some of the world's extreme danger spots, such as Russia, China and India, where AIDS is poised to explode. Further, while President Bush promised to spend $15 billion on AIDS over the next five years, the money has been slow in coming - we are hearing that in these first years the programs need to "ramp up", and that in subsequent years spending will increase. The problem with that is that people are dying while programs are being readied, and the numbers infected continue to grow alarmingly. It would be far better, and far more cost effective in the long run, to be putting money NOW into the Global Fund, where it can be speedily placed into effective programs on the ground, rather than re-creating programs of our own. Moreover, the Bush budget calls for far less funding for the Global fund in the upcoming fiscal year than was allocated by Congress last year. The effect of this would be to cut off life-saving medicines and programs already in place - surely a heartless and cruel thing to do. We can and must do better. History will judge us.