Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

THE LAW AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

Last post 04-20-2008, 8:09 PM by gyurika. 2 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  04-14-2008, 9:20 AM 7953

    THE LAW AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

    Welcome to the forum thread for "The Law and Infectious Disease," the Justice Talking show for the week of April 14 - 20, 2008.

    The way in which governments and intergovernmental organizations, such as the World Health Organization and the United Nations, respond to the potential spread of infectious disease is being debated across the globe. Public health measures intended to prevent the spread of epidemics — from HIV/Aids to Avian Flu, MRSA to Tuberculosis — raise many legal questions about privacy and civil liberties. Tune in to this edition of Justice Talking as we explore how health officials manage the spread of infectious disease and what it may mean for your rights.

    Please post your comments on this Justice Talking issue using this thread.

    Thanks for your participation!

    Judy Jarvis
    Outreach Coordinator 
  •  04-20-2008, 4:30 PM 7972 in reply to 7953

    Re: THE LAW AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

    Personally, I find it reprehensible that there is all this fear-mongering about vaccinations. Vaccinations have saved untold millions of babies, children and adults from crippling or deadly diseases. The discussion, as always, should be turned inward toward the quality control and proper evaluation of vaccines by our federal agencies.

    It is true that, just like any medication, there is some risk assessment involved. However, we live in a state of constant risk assessment. Think about it - every day people use their cars, ride bikes (with or without helmets), take over-the-counter medications, drink alcohol, go to smoke-filled bars and restaurants, breathe air with some level of pollutants, drink water that is impossible to brand as "pristine" no matter how much purification is done. All of these activities have some risk involved.

    Seems to me that promise of health care and technology has our current society expecting no less than perfection - and that just isn't going to happen! I can promise that with minimal federal oversight, the quality of our health care will be severely hampered. We will go back to a culture like we had before the Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906, with a plethora of snake oil salesmen that promise health but at the very least give us broken promises.

    Oh, and for the record, despite Margot's claim that no one says "better living through chemistry" anymore, you are all experiencing better living through chemistry whether you care to acknowledge that fact or not. Chemistry is the backbone behind all technological developments whether medical, material, or physical. No field is perfect - chemistry included - but the problems tend to be generated by the poor decision making of executives and governments, not the science.

  •  04-20-2008, 8:09 PM 7973 in reply to 7972

    Re: THE LAW AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE

    Mr/Ms Petrovic's post reaffirms my point that originally caused me to wanting to post. The format that was chosen for the vaccine discussion did not foster or make possible any meaningful intellectual consideration over the topic. Such would be the case when with great fanfare a controversy is introduced and then discussed only from one point of view. (much liked) Margot's effort to ask all the right questions to the best of her ability was of no help, because in the answers these were shrugged off, and there was no challenging opinion available.
    So Mr/Ms Petrovic's post - who clearly does not know the first thing about what is the scientific underpinning causing such controversy to exist in the first place - will be representative of most listeners' opinion. With anybody else hosting, I would tend to be suspicious that that was an intended goal of the program.
    What then remains the most alarming danger, - talking about reprehensible - how ready we are to form and express opinions without knowing any of the facts. Knowing this as a given, it would be the program's responsibility to give a balanced factual primer when any controversdy is being discussed.
    If Mr/Ms Petrovic were to take offense I challenge him/her to list some of the major dangers assiciated with vaccines.

View as RSS news feed in XML