Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

Court serves public interest

Riegel v. Medtronic, the U.S. Supreme Court delved into the thorny issue of who is best positioned to reconcile often competing interests in protecting public safety with protecting the market for medical devices. The idea that a jury of lay people is better able to decide about the appropriate design and labeling of a complex medical device, rather than scores of FDA experts, defies logic. Absent federal pre-emption, companies could face verdicts dictating standards that differ in every state.
Published Saturday, March 15, 2008 1:53 AM by Law.com - National Law Journal

© National Law Journal. All rights reserved.

Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.

Closed to Comments

Note: Justice Talking ceased production on June 30 of 2008. The Talking Justice blogs and forums are provided as a read-only resource for historical interest only. Commenting on blog posts has been suspended.

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The Annenberg Public Policy Center makes no claim as the the accuracy of claims or continued availability of any third party web links found on this site.

This Blog

Select Blog by Day

Syndication