FindLaw guest columnist Jonathan Hafetz, the Litigation Director for the Liberty and National Security Project of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU law school, comments on the recent decision regarding Guantanamo detainees' rights issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Hafetz explains why the decision's results were mixed, and argues that, in the end, the Bush Administration's Combatant Status Review Tribunal (CSRT) process is so deeply flawed, attempts to try to make it conform to due process and/or give rise to reliable results are inherently doomed to failure.