Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums
The Cato Institute seeks to broaden the parameters of public policy debate to allow consideration of the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, free markets and peace. Toward that goal, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government.

Begging His Pardon

Greetings, Justice Talking readers: happy to be able to join you.  Information about the Cato Institute should be directly above.  As for me, I'm a recovering lawyer whose policy interests range from executive power to overcriminalization.  On the former, see the Cato White Paper (coauthored with my colleague Tim Lynch) Power Surge: The Constitutional Record of George W. Bush.  On overcriminalization, some of what I've written can be found here and here

"Overcriminalization" is an umbrella term for what I see as three disturbing legal trends:   

  1. the use of the criminal law to punish behavior that used to be handled with civil lawsuits or fines, or even to cover behavior that’s just none of the government’s business.
  2. runaway federalization of crime:Though the Constitution leaves the ordinary administration of criminal justice to the states, over the last four decades, the federal government has increasingly involved itself in local criminal matters, leading to over 4,000 federal crimes on the books. 
  3. The use of heavy-handed criminal law enforcement tactics against people guilty of minor offenses at worst and in some cases people who aren’t guilty of crimes at all. 

The criminal law used to be society’s last line of defense—reserved for behavior that everyone recognized as seriously wrong.  Now it’s becoming Congress’s first line of attack--a way for legislators to show they’re serious about whatever social problem is currently making headlines, whether it’s drugs, corporate scandal, or email spam.  One result of that trend is an incarceration rate unrivaled in the Western world--one that passes even regimes like those in Iran, Cuba, and Russia.   

With over two million Americans in jail, many of them for nonviolent offenses, heartbreaking stories are legion.  Jonathan Rauch chronicles one of them in his Friday column for the National Journal, Honduran lobster-fleet owner David Henson McNab, currently doing hard time for importing lobster tails that were the wrong size and that were packaged in clear plastic bags rather than in cardboard boxes. McNab and three American seafood dealers ran afoul of the Lacey Act, a federal statute that makes it a crime to import fish or wildlife taken "in violation of any foreign law." McNab and two of the three Americans--citizens with no prior criminal record--got eight years in federal prison

As Rauch points out, despite his inordinate fondness for the unilateral exercise of executive powers, President Bush has been unconscionably timid in exercising one of the few executive powers that is truly unilateral--the pardon power.  McNab and his codefendants would be excellent candidates for a presidential pardon.  In an article for the Legal Times, I recommend a few more candidates (none of whom are Scooter Libby...). 

Published Monday, April 02, 2007 1:36 PM by Gene Healy

© Cato Institute. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.