Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

Gary Kalman - PIRG Democracy Project

About Gary Kalman

Gary Kalman directs U.S. PIRG’s federal legislative office in Washington, D.C. Earlier he led the legislative advocacy U.S. PIRG’s Democracy Program where he specialized in campaign finance, government accountability and election reform. He is the author of several reports on money and politics and has testified before Congress and been quoted in the national media including The Washington Post, USA Today, Fox News and MSNBC. He previously served as Deputy Director for the ACLU of Pennsylvania, Communications Director of Justice Talking and is a co-editor of "The U.S. Constitution: What is Says, What it Means" (Oxford University Press).

Landmark Reform

It took guilty pleas on corruption charges from disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Reps. Randy “Duke” Cunningham and Bob Ney.  It came after Justice Department investigations of Reps. William Jefferson, Rick Renzi and John Doolittle and Sen. Ted Stevens.  The 110th Congress finally passed comprehensive lobby reform.  They did it just before they left ofr August recess.

 

The bill that passed the House and Senate in the final week before its August recess represents the most sweeping reforms to the congressional rules since the Watergate era. 

 

For far too long, lobbyists for powerful interests have spent whatever it might cost to gain special access to lawmakers.  Paying for meals, gifts, tickets to sporting events and trips, lobbyists curry favor with key legislators in ways the rest of us could never afford.  The “ K Street ” crowd, so named for the cluster of lobby firms located on a single street, has also provided enormous help in raising the $2.8 billion dollars that was spent in the last congressional election. And most of this was done behind the public’s back.

 

During the last election congressional approval reached historic lows and sagging poll numbers suggest that the 110th Congress has a long way to go to win back the public trust.  The public has developed a healthy skepticism regarding how Congress will handle the war, healthcare, energy policy and a host of other priorities.  That said, meaningful changes to the rules aimed at ratcheting down the money culture in Washington are an important step forward.  We may not be able to stop the truly corrupt, but we can define and ban corrupting behavior.  It should not be acceptable or commonplace for lobbyists to wine and dine our representatives to line their pockets and for their clients’ gain. 

 

The reform measure will soon be sent to the President for his signature.  He has expressed “serious concerns” with the bill, but he should set aside those concerns and sign it.   The bill challenges the pay-to-play culture in Washington and opens the door on the previously secretive practices of lobbyists.  The bill bans gifts and travel paid for by lobbyists and requires members to pay their own way for the use of private jets.  Once these changes are put in place, lobbyists would no longer be able to pay for lavish parties at the national political conventions.  The bill mandates the disclosure of the tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars that lobbyists raise for candidates and for the first time establishes accountability for earmarks – funding for pet projects that legislators insert into bills.

 

The legislation is not perfect and critics will cite shortcomings, but the new rules and increased transparency of lobbying activities will take our democracy out of the darkness.  The mandates in the bill to post information on the Internet bring the government into the 21st century. The new rules require information to be available so that it can be scrutinized by constituents, the press, political allies and opponents, and government watchdogs.  It will allow all of us to get a more complete picture about the actions of lobbyists and their relationships with our elected officials.

 

Members of Congress do not tighten the rules that govern their own actions easily or willingly.  One would have to go back to the Watergate era to find the last time Congress overhauled rules to this degree.  It took widely publicized scandals, a frustrated electorate and a few members, like Senators Reid (NV), Obama (IL), Feingold (WI) and Lieberman (CT) and Representatives Pelosi (CA), Emanuel (IL) and Van Hollen (MD) to push colleagues to include more than cosmetic changes. 

 

This bill does not solve the all the problems created by money in politics.  Candidates for Congress and the White House will likely raise and spend $3 billion in next year’s election.  Most of that money will come in large contributions from wealthy and powerful interests who “max out” on what individuals are legally permitted to give.  To address these issues, we must reconsider how we fund political campaigns.

 

Nor does the bill include an independent panel to enforce the new rules.  Congress must address that shortcoming when they return.

 

The bill does strike at unacceptable practices that unduly influence decisions in Washington. It provides for greater disclosure of what happens in the nation’s capitol and more accountability of our elected officials.  It is a welcome change that is long overdue.

Published Monday, August 27, 2007 12:23 PM by Gary Kalman

© Gary Kalman. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.