hypocritical politicians manipulate system to serve their own agendas.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Few politicians will have fallen as hard and
fast from the summit of political ambition as New York Gov. Eliot
Spitzer, allegedly caught meeting with a prostitute. Indeed, Spitzer's
fall may reveal some important lessons about the limits of crusader
politics as officials like Spitzer practice it.
Critics and political opponents of the governor
called for - and got - his resignation based on the traditional
justifications of ethical weakness and criminal actions. But let's not
overlook Spitzer's political hypocrisy. He purposefully and willfully
ruined reputations and careers based on allegations of the same
behavior he now reluctantly admits to participating in.
As a crusader, Spitzer manipulated the legal
system in ways that served his own agenda. He bullied, threatened, and
strong-armed his opponents, frequently relying on specious legal
arguments and the threat of litigation to remove those he believed were
corrupt and unworthy of the positions they held.
Eliot Spitzer's story is not a random or even
unique one. It applies to a culture of politics that accepts a
no-holds-barred approach to pursing political goals and allowing
individual politicians to define for themselves the "public interest."
Spitzer's reign as attorney general was the stuff
of superhero comic books and novels. The superhero rushed into a
corrupt world, ridding it of evil so embedded in society and governance
that regular law enforcement could not exorcise it. The superhero
skirts the law to bring evil doers to justice. But, it's okay, because
the end result is a better society-in the superhero's eyes.
In order to root out evil, the superhero has to
be above and beyond the law-the rules that common men and women live
buy. The superhero uses his guile and ability to raise above pedestrian
social customs and rules to put down those he believes corrupt society.
But Spitzer lives in the real world and the
Founding Fathers developed a government based accountability, checks
and balances. In Spitzer's case, separation of powers-that crafty
principle of federalism that gave state and federal governments
different responsibilities-is also playing an important role.
The particular crime bringing Mr. Spitzer down is
also noteworthy. The most powerful man in New York politics is being
subdued by a victimless crime-prostitution. He has admitted to
participating in an expensive prostitution ring using the fittingly
named Emperor's Club VIP. Stockholders and investors were not
defrauded. Corporate titans were not abusing their power. No one was
robbed. No one's property was threatened.
Mr. Spitzer will likely be prosecuted under the
rarely invoked Mann Act, an early 20th century legal relic put in place
to stop interstate prostitution. It is exactly the kind of shell of a
law that Mr. Spitzer pursued with gusto to bring down those he
personally targeted as corrupt and unworthy of their positions in
corporate America. As New York's Attorney General, Spitzer indicted,
prosecuted, and jailed dozens of people for running "escort services"
and "sex tourism."
Mr. Spitzer's family will suffer terribly from
this mess. But these transgressions are Spitzer's. They are not the
fault of the entrepreneurs operating the Emperor's Club or its other
clients. They are the transgressions of a crusader who couldn't see the
hypocrisy of failing to follow the same standards he expected of
everyone else, who acted above the law, and, in the end, is being held
accountable.