Regular readers of this blog may know by now that Roy L. Pearson Jr., an administrative law judge (ALJ) here in the District of Columbia and the plaintiff in the internationally infamous multimillion-dollar lawsuit against his neighborhood dry cleaners, has decided that he has not yet had enough.
Though a Superior Court trial judge ruled against him unequivocally in June; and though the defendants publicly offered an olive branch when they announced they would not seek an order requiring him to pay the nearly $83,000 in attorneys fees they'd accrued in fending him off for more than two years, Pearson nonetheless last week filed a notice of intent to appeal his ludicrous at best, delusional at worst case to the D.C. Court of Appeals.
According to Ted Frank at at Overlawyered.com notes, the average appeal within that particular court takes roughly a year and a half to run its course. So the legal nightmare that Jin and Soo Chung, the immigrant owners of Customs Cleaners, have suffered will continue while pursuit of their American Dream is again deferred.
In the meantime, Pearson remains on the D.C. government payroll, receiving his six-figure ALJ salary at taxpayers' expense. Though the D.C. commission responsible for deciding whether or not he'll be reappointed to a full 10-year term has reportedly sent Pearson a confidential letter laying out the reasons why they do not intend to reappoint him, D.C.'s bureaucratic rules allow him to request yet another hearing at which he can appeal their decision, too.
It stands to reason that this unappealing character, as fond of appeals as he is, will undoubtedly make such a request, though a hearing's not likely to be scheduled before the middle of next month. ATRA will keep you posted.