Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

American Tort Reform Association

Since 1986, American Tort Reform Association is the only national organization exclusively dedicated to reforming the civil justice system. ATRA was co-founded in 1986 by the American Medical Association and the American Council of Engineering Companies. Since that time, ATRA has been working to bring greater fairness, predictability and efficiency to America's civil justice system. ATRA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with affiliated coalitions in more than 40 states. ATRA's membership is diverse and includes nonprofits, small and large companies, as well as state and national trade, business, and professional associations.

About Sherman Joyce

SHERMAN JOYCE is President of the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA), a national coalition of more than 300 non-profit organizations, professional societies, trade associations and corporations working through in-state coalitions to bring fairness and efficiency to the civil justice system. As President of ATRA, Mr. Joyce is the Association's Chief Executive Officer and a member of its Board of Directors.

Upon graduation from Princeton University, Joyce served as a legislative assistant to U.S. Senator John C. Danforth (R - MO) until 1984. Following graduation from Catholic University Law School, he served as minority counsel to the Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space of the Senate's Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation from 1987 to 1989.

He then moved to the minority counsel position with the committee's Subcommittee on the Consumer where he led Republican efforts to establish uniform rules for product liability law. In addition, he advised Senators on issues pertaining to product safety, antitrust law, advertising, and consumer and telemarketing fraud.

Accepting leadership responsibilities with ATRA in 1994, Joyce has since appeared on numerous television and radio programs to discuss civil justice issues, and he has been quoted extensively in newspapers across the country. In 1995 the National Law Journal recognized him as one of its "40 under 40", a compilation of 40 influential lawyers in the nation under age 40.


Making State Attorneys General Accountable

The American Tort Reform Association has renewed its call for increased transparency and accountability from state attorneys general with a new survey showing that Americans want these powerful state officials to adhere to fundamental standards of good-government when they enter contracts with private sector personal injury law firms. 

 

In each of five states surveyed—Alabama, California, Ohio, Wisconsin and West Virginia—roughly three of every four respondents said that all contracts that state attorneys general (AGs) make with outside lawyers should be posted on the Internet for public inspection.  Approximately 85 percent of those surveyed in each state also believe that AGs should require outside lawyers working for their states on a contingency fee basis to keep detailed records of their hours and specific work performed.  (The full survey results are listed below and will be posted on ATRA’s dedicated AGAgendaWatch website, www.agwatch.org , as of Monday, Apr. 23.)

 

In several states today, attorneys general are working hand-in-glove with their political supporters in private sector law firms, using the awesome power of the state to bring lawsuits against entire industries, such as paint and pigment manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies and makers of other consumer products.

 

Frequently enough such litigation seeks to achieve public policy ends that couldn’t be achieved through democratic legislative and regulatory processes.  But sometimes these lawsuits appear to be little more than thinly disguised efforts both to boost the media profile of AGs and enrich their political friends.

 

Too often these arrangements are governed by non-competitive contracts that are negotiated behind closed doors.  And the contingency fees upon which these contracts are typically based give private lawyers, backed by state authority, a pernicious incentive to maximize the damage awards a defendant may be obligated to pay, even if civil justice is minimized in the process. 

 

Believing that relationships between attorneys general and personal injury law firms pose a considerable threat to constitutional democracy and certain state economies, ATRA continues to insist that these relationships require public scrutiny and strict legislative oversight.  It’s nice to know, as our survey shows, that the public wholeheartedly agrees.

 

Our survey is a first step in a reenergized effort to shine more light on and demand greater accountability from state attorneys general.  There is overwhelming public support for much more transparency, and three-quarters of survey respondents go so far as to support a national code of ethics to regulate the relationships between personal injury lawyers and state AGs.

 

ATRA’s survey was conducted in five key states across the country, all of which have either newly-elected or historically activist attorneys general.  Survey details follow:

 

ATRA Attorney General Survey Results from

Alabama , California, Ohio, West Virginia and Wisconsin

 

                                  Grid: Yes | No | Unsure (percentage)

 

 

Questions:

 

(Answers expressed in percentages)

Alabama

(N=600)

2/27-28

+/- 4.1%

 

Yes |    No    |     ?

California

(N=1,000)

2/27-3/4

+/-3.1%

 

Yes |    No    |     ?

Ohio

(N=800)

2/27-3/1

+/-3.5%

 

Yes |    No    |     ?

West Virginia

(N=600)

3/5-6

+/-4.1%

Yes |    No    |     ?

Wisconsin

(N=600)

2/27-3/1

+/- 4.1%

 

Yes |    No    |     ?

Should the Attorney General publicly disclose all contracts with outside lawyers and make those contracts easily available for public inspection on the Internet?

78

15

7

73

17

11

77

15

8

74

15

11

74

18

8

Should the Attorney General competitively bid contracts for outside lawyers?

66

27

7

64

23

13

68

23

9

59

27

14

66

25

10

Should the Attorney General allow the Legislature to review contingency fee contracts with outside lawyers before signing them?

69

25

6

71

20

9

73

20

6

69

23

9

72

23

5

Should the Attorney General require outside lawyers working on a contingency fee basis to release detailed records of the hours they work and what they do?

87

12

1

83

13

5

87

11

3

87

9

4

87

11

2

Should the Attorney General allow revenue generated from lawsuit settlements to be treated like all other state revenue and be appropriated by the legislature before it can be spent?

76

19

5

71

17

12

74

17

9

75

16

10

76

18

6

Would you support the creation of a National Code of Ethics to govern contracts for outside lawyers for state Attorneys General across the country?

74

23

3

72

21

6

78

18

4

80

14

6

77

19

4

 

Research Methodology    The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) commissioned the Tarrance Group to conduct an objective scientific survey with adults over 18.  Interviews were conducted by phone.  All respondents interviewed were part of a fully representative sample based on the latest census figures within the state.  The confidence interval associated with a sample of this type is such that 95 percent of the time results will be within the stated margins of error of the “true values” where “true values” refer to the results obtained if it were possible to interview every adult in each state.

 

Published Monday, April 23, 2007 8:30 AM by Sherman Joyce

© American Tort Reform Association. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.

Closed to Comments

Note: Justice Talking ceased production on June 30 of 2008. The Talking Justice blogs and forums are provided as a read-only resource for historical interest only. Commenting on blog posts has been suspended.

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The Annenberg Public Policy Center makes no claim as the the accuracy of claims or continued availability of any third party web links found on this site.

This Blog

Syndication