Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

Wade Henderson - Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

Fedup with FedEx? What's Next?

Few things are more important to the American ideal than the dignity of work. Though we've had a rocky road toward enacting fair labor laws and robust enforcement of such laws, all Americans believe that workers should be treated and compensated fairly for work that they do. 

For years, the FedEx Corporation has made a mockery of our nation's commitment to fair labor practices. The corporation has deliberately misclassified its FedEx Ground drivers as "independent contractors" in an effort to fatten its bottom line and circumvent federal anti-discrimination laws.

But an October 15 decision by a federal judge in Indiana to grant class-action status to thousands of FedEx drivers suing for owed wages and benefits may signal the beginning of the end of this controversial practice.

At issue in the case is whether or not the contractors should be considered FedEx employees, and entitled to all the protections and benefits associated with it.

Currently, FedEx employs approximately 15,000 so-called independent contractors, but the number of litigants in the class action suit could balloon to 20,000.

Misclassifying drivers as independent contractors allows FedEx to wiggle out of paying health insurance, pension benefits and complying with labor laws. This means the contractors do not have the right to unionize nor are they protected by federal employment laws. Contractors are in no-man’s land because they are neither their own bosses nor do they have the legal rights of FedEx employees.

Workplace rights are civil rights.  American Rights at Work and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights released a report, FedUp with FedEx: How FedEx Ground Tramples Workers’ Rights and Civil Rights, late last month that highlights the civil rights implications of FedEx’s practices and contains a number of personal testimonies from FedEx employees.

Bottom line?

FedEx's tactics are part of a larger effort on their part to stymie union organizing. 

Just a few weeks ago, FedEx paid a settlement of $253,000 to five former or present drivers to settle charges of illegally harassing and intimidating the drivers.  FedEx had also allegedly terminated the contracts of four of the drivers to prevent a local union election in Northboro, Massachusetts.

What we need from Congress is a commitment to fair labor practices. Civil rights groups and labor are united in our call for Congress to strengthen labor and employment laws to make it more difficult for companies like FedEx to misclassify workers. Legislation like the Employee Free Choice Actwould restore fairness to the process by which employees choose union representation and go a long way toward protecting the nation’s workers from unscrupulous employers.

Published Monday, November 19, 2007 12:00 AM by Wade Henderson

© Wade Henderson/Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.

Closed to Comments

Note: Justice Talking ceased production on June 30 of 2008. The Talking Justice blogs and forums are provided as a read-only resource for historical interest only. Commenting on blog posts has been suspended.

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The Annenberg Public Policy Center makes no claim as the the accuracy of claims or continued availability of any third party web links found on this site.

This Blog

Syndication