Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

About Kevin Cathcart

Kevin M. Cathcart, executive director of Lambda Legal since 1992, is a leading strategist and spokesperson in the movement to achieve full recognition of the civil rights of lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transgender people and people with HIV. Under his leadership, Lambda Legal’s groundbreaking work reached new heights in 2003 when it won a U.S. Supreme Court victory, Lawrence v. Texas, striking down Texas’ “Homosexual Conduct” law and every law like it in the nation. Cathcart graduated from Richard Stockton State College (New Jersey) in 1976 and the Harvard Graduate School of Education in 1978. He received his J.D. from Northeastern School of Law in 1982.

Time to Bring Down “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”

A group of 28 retired generals and admirals recently released a letter urging Congress to repeal the military’s beleaguered “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy — a policy that has destroyed the careers of approximately 12,000 servicemembers since 1993. Think about that number: 12,000 people who served their country with distinction, in many cases going off to war, but who were ultimately forced to give up their careers because they were discovered to be gay or lesbian.

During this time in civilian life, our communities have made great progress in the workplace. Today more than one third of all U.S. states protect people from being fired based on sexual orientation. A growing number of employers and city and local governments also offer these important protections. But, in the words of our colleagues at Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, DADT remains “the only law in the land that authorizes the firing of an American for being gay....”

The emphasis there is mine. The policy not only authorizes these firings, it compels them, unless servicemembers can hide their sexual orientation. This is the most insidious part of the DADT equation, forcing people to make the choice between their careers and other equally important areas of life. And even when people do make the painful decision to stay in the closet and preserve their service, there is still the threat of being “discovered.”

That’s what happened to Major Margaret Witt. Highly decorated throughout 19 years of military service, Witt was fired after someone else revealed that she had lived with a civilian same-sex partner hundreds of miles from her military base. Lambda Legal submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the ACLU’s federal case challenging DADT on Witt’s behalf, asking the question: If DADT does not allow Witt to serve, when she made every effort to keep her sexual orientation private, whom would it allow?

The past 14 years have given us the answer: All gay and lesbian servicemembers are at risk, and that risk surfaces in many ways. We recently represented a gay man whose custody rights were threatened by DADT when his soon-to-be-ex-wife mounted a custody challenge based, in part, on the fact that he had a same-sex partner. Our client could have lost his job and his pension (and thus his means of supporting his children, as well as himself) if his identity and sexual orientation had become public in the course of filing court papers in a custody case.

Cases like this illustrate the policy’s devastating ramifications in both personal and professional arenas, as servicemembers are forced to assess whether exercising their rights constitutes “telling” their sexual orientation — while their careers hang in the balance.

The U.S. military is the largest employer in the nation. Service can provide a gateway to education and training, highly placed government jobs and elected office. It is also an inroad to more basic benefits, pensions, etc. To deny gay and lesbian people access to these benefits is damaging, discriminatory and demeaning to all servicemembers.

In their letter to Congress, the 28 retired generals and admirals noted as much. “As is the case in Britain, Israel and other nations which allow gays and lesbians to serve openly, our servicemembers are professionals who are able to work together effectively despite differences in race, gender, religion and sexuality,” they wrote. Indeed three out of four soldiers returning from Iraq or Afghanistan said they had no problem fighting alongside gay and lesbian soldiers, according to a recent Zogby poll.

The group of 28 also cited scholarly data showing 65,000 gay and lesbian soldiers currently serving in the military — that’s far too many people living with the fear that they could be fired anywhere, anytime simply because of who they are. It’s time to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” America’s armed forces would be much stronger for it.

Read more >>

Combating the Military’s Antigay Policy

Q & A with Kathi S. Westcott
Deputy Director for Law for Servicemembers Legal Defense Network

Published Friday, December 14, 2007 11:59 PM by Kevin Cathcart

© Kevin Cathcart/Lambda Legal. All rights reserved.

Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.

Closed to Comments

Note: Justice Talking ceased production on June 30 of 2008. The Talking Justice blogs and forums are provided as a read-only resource for historical interest only. Commenting on blog posts has been suspended.

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The Annenberg Public Policy Center makes no claim as the the accuracy of claims or continued availability of any third party web links found on this site.

This Blog

Select Blog by Day

Syndication