Three years after the REAL ID Act, the government's driver's license reform program, became law, the Department of Homeland Security has finally issued its rules for implementing the Act.
Sadly, the rules raise more questions than provide answers. Given the longstanding opposition of many states, it appears that DHS’s first order of business was to diffuse that opposition. Rather than requiring states to implement the Act now, the final rule pushes back full implementation until 2017; however, citizens born after Dec. 1, 1964 will have to start using the REAL ID card by Dec. 1, 2014.
That stretches out implementation over the next six to ten years and leaves many of the hard decisions to the states. What is worse, the rule punts on the privacy issue, saying only that the creation of REAL ID cards should follow a set of "best practices" solutions, which the states are in no way obligated to follow. With the slower rollout, the impact on American’s privacy will be more difficult to track. Like the proverbial frog in boiling water, we may not fully feel the loss until it’s too late.
One of the biggest concerns that we at the Center for Democracy & Technology have about the Act is the strong possibility that Real ID will be implemented using a centralized database to house personal information collected in the course of creating these cards.
But don't look for the phrase "create a centralized database” in the final regulations, it isn't there. However, when you drill down into the tedious government prose it's clear that DHS strongly supports creating a “hub” IT infrastructure. This plan leverages the architecture of the existing commercial driver’s license database, which is centralized and accessible by all 50 states, as a model for setting up the information infrastructure of REAL ID.
A centralized database, containing the personal, private data on hundreds of millions of Americans, would create a tremendous security risk, a mother lode for identity thieves, terrorists and all manner of computer criminals.
At the same time, citizens—starting with those under 50—will be required to present an easy to read Real ID with an insecure, unencrypted standardized barcode for a variety of federal purposes. And it won’t take long before the states and many commercial entities start to demand the REAL ID card for a variety of other purposes, repopulating personal data in a variety of databases.
So now the troubled legacy of this Act will shadow the next administration. And in that, there may be flicker of hope. With a little White House muscle, and a shot of political will from a newly minted Congress, perhaps REAL ID can be repealed and a sensible plan for driver’s license security be enacted in its place. Then we can turn our gaze once again to the horizon, searching for new solutions that don't erode privacy and shred civil liberties in the name of national security.