Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

Bryan Fair - University of Alabama School of Law

About Bryan Fair

Professor Bryan K. Fair joined the University of Alabama School of Law in 1991 and was named the Thomas E. Skinner Professor of Law in 2000. He teaches courses on constitutional law; race and racism; sexism and American law; and the First Amendment. He also directs the University of Fribourg, Switzerland/UA cooperative educational program. Professor Fair served as an assistant vice president for academic affairs at The University of Alabama from 1994 to 1997. The author of Notes of a Racial Caste Baby: Colorblindness and the End of Affirmative Action (NYU Press 1997), Professor Fair’s research agenda focuses primarily on equality and equal protection theory and jurisprudence.

Racist Abuses of Power

Thanks to Rev. Al Sharpton, Martin Luther King, III, and thousands of other friends, family, and supporters, much of the world has by now seen, heard, or read about the tragic story of Robert Bailey, Mychal Bell, Carwin Jones, Bryant Purvis, Theo Shaw, and Jesse Ray Beard – the Jena 6. After a school fight which left Justin Barker, a white student, severely beaten, the six black youths were arrested and initially charged with attempted second degree murder. Later, the charges were reduced to aggravated second degree battery and conspiracy. Usually, a charge of aggravated battery requires the use of a deadly weapon. Here, the local prosecutor, jury, and judge decided the deadly weapon was a tennis shoe. Despite their ages, all but one were charged as adults.

The Jena 6 story began in August 2006, when a new black student at the high school asked an administrator if it was permissible for black students to sit under a tree where white students traditionally gathered. After black students sat under the tree, nooses were found hanging from the tree the following day.

Despite the clear threat and intimidation implicit in the hanging of the nooses, the three white students responsible were charged with no crimes. Instead, the local board of education overruled the Principal’s recommendation that the white students be expelled. The white students were assigned to an alternative school for a few days and then served in-school suspension.

Outraged by this lenient punishment, black students gathered again under the so-called "white tree" to protest. The Principal then apparently called an assembly and invited local police and the district attorney, Reed Walters. Many of the black students believed that Walters was threatening them when he reportedly said, "With one stroke of my pen, I can make your life disappear." His subsequent actions confirmed their fears.

In December 2006, Robert Bailey, one of the Jena 6 defendants, and a few black friends tried to enter a party attended mostly by whites. They were attacked and beaten by a group of white men. Only one of those white men was charged with simply battery.

A day or so later, a white student who had been at the same party encountered Bailey and some friends. After an argument, the white student produced a shotgun. Bailey and others took the gun away from the student. The black students were charged with theft of a firearm, second degree robbery, and disturbing the peace. Apparently, no charges were brought against the white student who threatened the black students with a gun.

Justin Barker was attacked by black students a day or so later. They allegedly punched and kicked him, rendering him unconscious. Barker was treated and released from the hospital after a couple of hours and attended a high school social that evening.

The Jena 6 story is a reminder that despite all the rhetoric to the contrary, it remains true in the United States that there is one set of laws for whites and a different set for blacks. The case tells me that it is still true that in too many locales, black people have no rights that white people must respect. Jena reminds me of Money, Mississippi; Little Rock, Arkansas; Scottsboro, Birmingham, and Selma, Alabama; as well as so many unsung, unknown communities where some who control the white power structure misuse it to abuse black people.

The American criminal justice system is decidedly anti-black. The entire system is infested with racial bias and animus. And too many prosecutors in large and small towns like Jena, Louisiana, use their enormous power in racist and draconian ways to punish blacks for behavior or conduct that receives no criminal punishment when done by many whites. Surely, the message in Jena is that blacks who don’t stay in their place will be punished.

Reed Walters deserves much of the blame in this case. But it also took a jury and judge to indict and convict Mychal Bell in June of 2007. Fortunately, an appellate court has overturned Bell’s conviction on the ground that he should not have been charged and tried as an adult since he was only 16 when the fight occurred. But that reversal in no way addresses the deep-seeded racial animus present in the whole episode. Moreover, Bell still faces aggravated assault charges which could render him in juvenile detention for four more years.

People of goodwill of whatever race or color must lift up their voices and repudiate the patently racist administration of justice in Jena and in every other town in the United States. We must demand action against prosecutors who abuse their power on the backs of black children. We must galvanize our communities to run those prosecutors out of public office when they breach the public trust by violating core anti-discrimination constitutional values. They are not above the law and they should be made to pay for their racist behavior. The law may protect Walters’ right to believe in the racial superiority of the white race, but it must not allow him to misuse the power of the state to enforce his private prejudices.

Published Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:34 PM by Bryan Fair

© Bryan Fair. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.