Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums

Julie F. Kay - Legal Momentum

About Julie F. Kay

Julie F. Kay is a Staff Attorney at Legal Momentum, a non-profit law center in New York. Working in the Sexuality and Family Rights Program, she challenges gender bias and sex discrimination promoted by federal "abstinence-only" programs. Before joining Legal Momentum, Kay was a Legal Consultant to the Irish Family Planning Association and a Staff Attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights in New York. A graduate of Harvard University and Brooklyn Law School, Kay served as a law clerk to U.S. District Judge Mark L. Wolf. 

Hooking-Up Hysteria

Here it comes, the latest hysteria over teen sex.  The newest firestorm is about whether young adults, particularly young women, are “hooking up” too often.  This latest panic is spurred by several new books with hooking up in their titles.  The ensuing media frenzy – girls gone wild! -- uses new lingo to revive the same old fear that girls are giving away the milk rather than making the boys buy the cow. 

“Hooking up” may not involve sex at all.  The expression refers to any sexual conduct --from holding hands to “going all the way.”  According to Laura Sessions Stepp, author of the new back-lashing book Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay Love and Lose at Both, none of these activities should take place outside of a truly committed relationship.  Be warned: young women who hook up will likely end up damaged and, gasp, unmarried. 

Session Stepp despairs over the fact that today’s “busy girls” fail to prioritize “romance” over sports, studying and careers.  Bring on the same tired stereotypes: women want marriage; men just want sex.  “Give” them the sex and you won’t get the ring. 

Once again we are embracing inflammatory rhetoric while shunning a real discussion of young people and sex.  Like the alarm over supposed “rainbow parties”  – that old urban myth about oral sex as a competitive sport among teens keeping score with lipstick -- this latest panic about teen sexuality causes its own harm, particularly to young women.  Hooking up hysteria simply puts a contemporary twist on old ways of chastising young women for “putting out.”  Boys are cleared of any wrongdoing because they are still stereotyped as just naturally wanting sex and not relationships. 

But love, relationships, and sex are far more complicated than these traditional stereotypes.  Continuing to deny that girls and young women have any sexual feelings provides them no protection from the risks of sexual activity, and makes positive sexual experience all the more unobtainable.  Painting all boys and men as simply lascivious ignores their desire for relationships and commitment.

Moreover, there are real problems with sex on campus that we should be spending time talking about: the effects of binge drinking and drug use, lack of consent and ambiguous consent, high rates of sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies, to name just a few.   

Yet the U.S. continues to deny adolescents and young adults even the most basic sexuality education, and continues to have one of the highest rates of teen pregnancy  among industrialized nations.  Our national policy promoting abstinence-only education  precludes giving even basic contraceptive information to teens and instead simply labels all sexual activity outside of marriage as harmful and morally wrong. 

Instead of teen sex hysteria, we need to promote comprehensive reproductive education that honestly discusses the risks and benefits of “hooking up” or not.  


Published Sunday, March 11, 2007 12:01 AM by Julie F. Kay

© Julie F. Kay. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



 

galin said:

While "Rainbow Party," by Paul Ruditis, has received a less-than-enthusiastic reception from booksellers, it has won plenty of attention from bloggers and conservative columnists and prompted lots of talk among teenagers, parents and school officials.

August 31, 2007 9:52 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.

Closed to Comments

Note: Justice Talking ceased production on June 30 of 2008. The Talking Justice blogs and forums are provided as a read-only resource for historical interest only. Commenting on blog posts has been suspended.

All opinions expressed are those of the author. The Annenberg Public Policy Center makes no claim as the the accuracy of claims or continued availability of any third party web links found on this site.

This Blog

Select Blog by Day

Syndication