Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums
The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy (ACS) is one of the nation's leading progressive legal organizations. Founded in 2001, ACS is a rapidly growing network of lawyers, law students, scholars, judges, policymakers and other concerned individuals. Our mission is to ensure that fundamental principles of human dignity, individual rights and liberties, genuine equality, and access to justice enjoy their rightful, central place in American law. ACS is a non-partisan, non-profit educational organization. We do not, as an organization, lobby, litigate or take positions on specific issues, cases, legislation or nominations. We do encourage our members to express their views and make their voices heard.

All I Want For Equal Pay Day Is . . .

by Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Counsel at the National Women’s Law Center

April is now here — the Cherry Blossoms are blooming in D.C., warmer weather has returned, and many are at least thinking about spring cleaning. April is also a time for commemorating Equal Pay Day. Equal Pay Day is observed in April to mark the point in each year at which an average woman’s wages finally catch up to the wages earned the year before by the average man. And this year women, who make 77 cents for every dollar a man makes (63 cents for African American women and 52 cents for Latinas), reach that point on April 22nd.

I’ve already decided what I want for Equal Pay Day. True, typically gifts are not exchanged — indeed, if there were a gift it would be finally closing the wage gap so that Equal Pay Day would no longer be a necessary commemoration. But this year workers are still reeling from the Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. from last term and so a shorter term gift is in order.

Just a bit of background on the decision — for many years, the supermajority of courts (indeed, 9 of the 10 courts to consider the issue) and the EEOC applied a commonsense rule to pay discrimination claims: each paycheck renews the discrimination and the statute of limitations. Then came Ledbetter. Lilly Ledbetter spent close to 20 years at Goodyear receiving pay that was far less than the amounts earned by male co-workers performing the same job. But she did not have firm evidence of discrimination until very close to the time she retired, when she received an anonymous note informing her of the pay discrimination. Nonetheless, last May the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that employees have only 180 days after the first discriminatory paycheck to file a formal complaint, even when the discrimination persists to the present time and even when employers continue to gain a windfall from it.

The Ledbetter decision turned the longstanding circuit court and EEOC rule on its head. Not only is it unworkable (pay information is often confidential and, unlike other forms of discrimination, paychecks are not announced, or treated by employees, as adverse employment actions), but it also provides incentives for employers to hide discriminatory pay decisions for the first six months, hoping to then discriminate free of charge.

Last summer the House of Representatives responded swiftly by passing legislation to restore the law to the way it has always been. The Senate introduced similar legislation in the Fair Pay Restoration Act . The Act makes clear that compensation discrimination claims accrue whenever a discriminatory compensation decision or practice is adopted, when a person becomes subject to the decision or practice, or when a person is affected by the decision or practice, including whenever he or she receives a discriminatory paycheck . This legislation would ensure that workers are protected from workplace discrimination as Congress intended.

The National Women’s Law Center has more information on how you can help commemorate Equal Pay Day or participate in the Fair Pay Campaign. Lawyers and law students can also get involved here.

Published Wednesday, April 09, 2008 10:04 AM by ACSLAW

© American Constitution Society for Law and Policy. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.