<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Public Justice</title><link>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.1)</generator><item><title>Ohio Joins the List of States Banning Payday Lending; Who Will Make the Sharks Follow the Law?</title><link>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/06/09/ohio-joins-the-list-of-states-banning-payday-lending-who-will-make-the-sharks-follow-the-law.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c794a4a-4327-4b82-9138-7f4f49be37c1:8188</guid><dc:creator>F. Paul Bland</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/comments/8188.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8188</wfw:commentRss><description>On Monday June 2, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland signed into law a new statute that bans payday lending and caps the interest rate on loans at 28%. Last Fall, the U.S. Congress passed a statute that capped interest rates at 36% for certain loans for members...(&lt;a href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/06/09/ohio-joins-the-list-of-states-banning-payday-lending-who-will-make-the-sharks-follow-the-law.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://communities.justicetalking.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8188" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Late Start and a Small Start With Credit Cards</title><link>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/05/08/a-late-start-and-a-small-start-with-credit-cards.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c794a4a-4327-4b82-9138-7f4f49be37c1:8045</guid><dc:creator>F. Paul Bland</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/comments/8045.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8045</wfw:commentRss><description>The credit card industry has really been running wild lately. After a frenzy of acquisitions and consolidation in the last several decades, only a few major banks issue the vast majority of credit cards in the United States, and the industry has been...(&lt;a href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/05/08/a-late-start-and-a-small-start-with-credit-cards.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://communities.justicetalking.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8045" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Supreme Court’s Hall Street Decision Reinforces Lawless Nature of Arbitration </title><link>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/04/08/Supreme-Court_1920_s-Hall-Street-Decision-Reinforces-Lawless-Nature-of-Arbitration-.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c794a4a-4327-4b82-9138-7f4f49be37c1:7925</guid><dc:creator>F. Paul Bland</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/comments/7925.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7925</wfw:commentRss><description>To people who’ve been paying attention (which is not, unfortunately, most of the American public), it’s not exactly news that Corporate America has been exempting itself from most of the United States civil legal system. Most consumer business-to-contracts...(&lt;a href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/04/08/Supreme-Court_1920_s-Hall-Street-Decision-Reinforces-Lawless-Nature-of-Arbitration-.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://communities.justicetalking.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7925" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The United States Supreme Court Takes On Four Preemption Cases Affecting Consumer Rights</title><link>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/03/08/the-united-states-supreme-court-takes-on-four-preemption-cases-affecting-consumer-rights.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c794a4a-4327-4b82-9138-7f4f49be37c1:7758</guid><dc:creator>Leslie A. Brueckner</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/comments/7758.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/commentrss.aspx?PostID=7758</wfw:commentRss><description>Nearly 25 years ago, the first brief that Public Justice (then Trial Lawyers for Public Justice) filed in the U.S. Supreme Court opposed federal preemption of an injury victim's claim. It urged the Supreme Court to hold that Karen Silkwood could seek...(&lt;a href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day08/archive/2008/03/08/the-united-states-supreme-court-takes-on-four-preemption-cases-affecting-consumer-rights.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://communities.justicetalking.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>