Welcome to Talking Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in
Justice Talking About All Blogs Today's Blog Forums
Public Justice (formerly Trial Lawyers for Public Justice) is America's public interest law firm. Dedicated to using trial lawyers' and other attorneys' skills and resources to advance the public good, Public Justice is supported by - and can call on -- a nationwide network of more than 3,000 of the nation's top lawyers to pursue precedent-setting and socially significant litigation. It has a wide-ranging litigation docket in the areas of consumer rights, worker safety, civil rights and liberties, toxic torts, environmental protection, and access to the courts. Public Justice is the principal project of The Public Justice Foundation, a not-for-profit membership organization headquartered in Washington, DC, with a West Coast office in Oakland, California. The Public Justice web site address is www.publicjustice.net.

About F. Paul Bland

F. Paul Bland, Jr., is a Staff Attorney for Public Justice (formerly Trial Lawyers for Public Justice), where he handles precedent-setting complex civil litigation. He has argued or co-argued and won more than twenty reported decisions from federal and state courts across the nation, including cases in the four federal Circuit Courts of Appeal and five state high courts. He was named the “Vern Countryman” Award winner in 2006 by the National Consumer Law Center, which “honors the accomplishments of an exceptional consumer attorney who, through the practice of consumer law, has contributed significantly to the well being of vulnerable consumers.” He is a co-author of a book entitled Consumer Arbitration Agreements: Enforceability and Other Issues, and numerous articles. For three years, he was a co-chair of the National Association of Consumer Advocates. He also has won the San Francisco Trial Lawyer of the Year in 2002 and Maryland Trial Lawyer of the Year in 2001 for his role in two cases challenging abusive mandatory arbitration clauses. Prior to coming to Public Justice, he was a plaintiffs’ class action and libel defense attorney in Baltimore. In the late 1980s, he was Chief Nominations Counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. He graduated from Harvard Law School in 1986, and Georgetown University in 1983.

A Late Start and a Small Start With Credit Cards

The credit card industry has really been running wild lately. After a frenzy of acquisitions and consolidation in the last several decades, only a few major banks issue the vast majority of credit cards in the United States, and the industry has been able to get more and more Americans to take out heavier and heavier debt loads. Today, America’s credit card debt load is approaching one trillion dollars (with millions of families having ten or more cards and more than $10,000 in outstanding debts), and the industry has continually raised both interest rates and punitive late fees, over-limit fees, etc. The industry’s profits have jumped 30% more since Congress adopted the "Bankruptcy Reform Act" three years ago that makes it harder for consumers who have fallen on hard times (very often due to medical debts stemming from an illness) to get a new start and become freed from their credit card debts.

As millions of Americans know all too well, the credit card industry has jacked up its profits through a wide variety of ugly, deceptive shenanigans. People sign up for cards because of low "teaser" rates, which are nearly always rapidly raised afterwards without any real justification; cards are heavily marketed to people (such as kids just arriving at college) who predictably are going to fall deeply into debt; games are played with when payments are considered "received" so that unfair late fees can be charged; and consumers are gouged in a host of similar ways.

These abuses have thrived because no one has been protecting consumers. The federal regulatory agencies have largely viewed their role almost exclusively in terms of protecting the profit margins of the credit card issuing banks (the agencies euphemistically prefer to call this focus the protection of the banks’ "safety and soundness"), and have fought jealously to block state regulators from doing anything to protect consumers.

Consumers have only rarely been able to get relief through consumer protection lawsuits, because too many courts have permitted banks to hide even the most egregious, deceptive and predatory practices behind the twin shields of (a) mandatory arbitration clauses that ban class actions and funnel cases into an industry-friendly arbitration company that nearly always rules for the banks; and (b) sweeping federal "preemption" of state laws that might protect consumers.

Finally, the Federal Reserve has taken notice, and has proposed rules that would outlaw a few of the most egregious abuses by credit card companies. Until detailed regulations are issued, the meaningfulness of these reforms is yet to be seen (federal agencies often engage in their own version of "bait and switch" by making vague promises to end abuses but then drafting rules whose fine print lets the cheating continue). But one thing is clear – the reforms will only apply prospectively, at best. Because the civil justice system has been so crippled with respect to credit card issuers, nearly all of the money already taken from consumers through deceptive and sharp practices will remain in the companies’ pockets.

The Fed wants the headline to be "Fed Solves Consumers’ Problems." The real headline is a little different: "Fed Promises to Finally Start Taking the First Halting Steps to Slow Down Consumer Rip Offs; Nation Waits to See If Promise Will Actually Be Kept."

Published Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:00 AM by F. Paul Bland

© Public Justice. All rights reserved.

Comments

Please note that we encourage a vigorous debate on the issues from all points along the political spectrum on the Talking Justice blogs and discussion forums. However, we ask that you stay to the topic of the particular blog or forum post and that the debate remain civil. Profanity, spam and personal attacks on the program host or guests, contributors or other Talking Justice users will not be tolerated and are subject to deletion without notice. Moreover, any comment which is patently offensive, threatening or potentially libelous will be removed without notice. Persons who repeatedly attempt to post material that violates the site policies may, at the discretion of Justice Talking, be blocked from participating in the future.

Justice Talking, not the individual bloggers on this site, will make all decisions about whether comments to the blogs contained here should be edited or removed and whether individuals who violate our policies will be allowed to continue to post. Also, please note that, like all of the content on the Justice Talking radio show, the views expressed on these blogs and discussion boards belong solely to the person or organization posting them and do not reflect the views or opinions of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, the University of Pennsylvania, or NPR.



No Comments
Anonymous comments are disabled. Click "Join" at top-right to add comments.