Visiting
by family and friends at federal institutions is strongly encouraged by the
Board of Prisons “to maintain the morale of the inmate and to develop closer
relationships between the inmate and family members.” Despite this policy,
however, the rules and the manner in which they are applied frequently
discourages visitation primarily because the rules often make no sense. For example,
inmates and their loved ones are not supposed to show any affection beyond the
initial greeting and goodbyes. How silly
for a husband and wife who have been married for over thirty years being forced
to behave like chaperoned teenagers on their first date.
Visiting
hours are from 8:00 to 2:00. That is a
long time to eat grub from vending machines which offer little in the way of
wholesome food – any thought of hot coffee or a hot meal during this time
period is a pipe dream; and the machines are virtually empty on the morning of
day two (Sunday) of a two-day visit schedule.
And, would I like the franchise on these machines! A lousy, cold ham and cheese sandwich is
$3.75. Bottles of Coca-Cola are a buck
and three-quarters, and often the vending machines steal enough from their
customers that the owners of those machines ought to be serving time for fraud
and theft.
The
rules seem designed to reduce grown women to children: “don’t touch the vending
machines;” “don’t handle money to purchase items from the vending machines;”
“don’t talk to fellow inmates in the visiting area;” “don’t wave to your family
after they have signed out and are departing the premises;” “don’t talk with
vendors when they make deliveries.” And these women are generally subjected to
strip searches after each visit. All of
this seems aimed at dehumanizing human beings.
Instead of “correcting” them and making them more social, these rules
seem to harden and make them more anti-social.
It is difficult to understand the rationale for most of the rules in
what is classified as a low security facility.
The
husband of one inmate was shot to death when someone demanded the keys to his
car while he was out shopping. The
answer to his wife’s request for permission to attend his funeral was
“no.” Why? Because the circumstances of the shooting
“looked suspicious.” What the hell
difference should it make? Her husband
was dead, regardless of the circumstances, and she should have been allowed to
attend his funeral.
The
husband of another woman had flown from the Far East
– a 14-hour flight – to visit. After renting a car and driving from the airport
to the “camp,” it was approximately 1:00 p.m.
Well, as stated above, visiting hours are from 8:00 to 2:00, but for
some inexplicable reason, he was not allowed to spend the remaining hour
visiting his wife.
Another visitor had flown in from Las
Vegas wearing a hat.
He checked in at a local motel and was driven to the facility in the
motel shuttle. Little did he know that
it was against the rules to bring a hat into the visiting room. So, he had to walk in the rain across the
street some 100-plus yards to check his hat into a locker.
One
can understand rules, even if they appear to be foolish, that prohibit the
entry of items into a “camp.” But, what
possible reason could there be for prohibiting visitors from taking items
purchased in a visiting area vending machine out of the facility? On my
visit, I had purchased a bottle of water and a bottle of Dr. Pepper. I had drunk about a third of the former and
one small swallow of the latter but I was informed that it was a violation of
the rules to leave the facility with my bottles of water and soda because they
had been opened. Huh?
Upon
reading this, I am certain that many will say, “These are criminals who deserve
what they are getting. They deserve to pay.”
Once upon a time, I was similarly inclined. But, as citizens, we pay for this irrational
and backward approach to criminal justice.
We pay dearly to support the prison system and we pay by not having
those who are confined performing productive tasks in our society. Moreover, as I watched 24-year-old mothers
visit with their little children and grandmothers visit with their sons, daughters
and grandchildren, I thought how hollow the call for “family values” sounds
when we look the other way rather than correct this tragedy of human beings
going to waste because of an irrational, expensive and backward approach to
criminal justice. Even worse, I am
convinced beyond any doubt that a very substantial number of the women wasting
time at this “camp” have been wrongly convicted because the system has now been
perfected to convict people rather than to mete out justice.
These facilities belong to us – the
American people – and those who work there work for us. What they do in the form of their often
ridiculous rules, they do with our tacit approval. If they abuse or dehumanize
people, they do so on our behalf - the American public; and we should be
ashamed of ourselves for tolerating this.
To
be continued…